Of course, some fans and friends have raised questions about this. Brother Jun noticed that in the comment area of yesterday afternoon's article, some fans and friends thought that yesterday's heavy volume was high and low, obviously there were funds fleeing. Since the funds are fleeing, no matter how the background changes, the market will probably fall in the short term!What does this mean? To put it simply, when the market opened sharply higher yesterday, the main institutions were unwilling to chase after it, so the decrease in buying was very obvious. However, the selling of institutional seats was basically the same as that on Monday. This shows that the main institutions did not deliberately borrow good shipments yesterday. In terms of hot money, it was still a net inflow yesterday.Like the support, I wish everyone a victory!
These days, Junge's review articles mainly focus on the market, and rarely mention the changes in the pattern of various parts of the market. This is because the recent hot spots in the main market are very clear, namely artificial intelligence and robots. In addition to these two main lines, there are several small hot spots that are difficult to become main lines around, that is, cultivating diamond and millet economy.Let's take a look at today's market. The full-day amplitude of the market is only 20 points, and it can't break through 3440 up. If it turns green down, it will be quickly pulled red. This narrow fluctuation of extremely low space is either the whole market is extremely inactive or controlled by a pair of invisible hands. This is almost the same as the trend during the Third Plenary Session of the Twentieth Central Committee in mid-July this year!So yesterday, the market opened higher and went lower. Is it really big money that is smashing the market? This can actually be seen from yesterday's transaction data. In this morning's [A-share news], Brother Jun analyzed in detail the position adjustment actions of institutions and hot money seats yesterday. Although yesterday's institutional funds did have a moderate net outflow, the outflow of institutional funds was only due to the decrease in buying, not the release of selling.
In addition, there is a group of people who were the main force of yesterday's pressure plate, that is, retail investors who suffered a big loss on October 8. This part of the investors have been convinced that yesterday's sharp opening will inevitably lead to a high opening and a low going, so they were selling at the opening yesterday. Some hesitant investors may have missed the high-selling opportunity opened yesterday, but they saw the unilateral decline of the market in intraday trading, which is replicating the trend of October 8. Worried that there will be a sharp drop in the next few days, I began to turn around and lighten my position.What does this mean? To put it simply, when the market opened sharply higher yesterday, the main institutions were unwilling to chase after it, so the decrease in buying was very obvious. However, the selling of institutional seats was basically the same as that on Monday. This shows that the main institutions did not deliberately borrow good shipments yesterday. In terms of hot money, it was still a net inflow yesterday.Of course, some fans and friends have raised questions about this. Brother Jun noticed that in the comment area of yesterday afternoon's article, some fans and friends thought that yesterday's heavy volume was high and low, obviously there were funds fleeing. Since the funds are fleeing, no matter how the background changes, the market will probably fall in the short term!